Search for: "Neal P. Dunn"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2014, 3:13 pm
Neal, 292 Kan. 625, 631, 258 P.3d 365 (2011) (a sentence that is based on incorrect criminal history qualifies as an illegal sentence). [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:36 pm
Elizabeth P. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:44 am
Seth Stern, an attorney at Funkhouser Vegosen Liebman & Dunn Ltd. and former journalist, explored implications for transparency and public access. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:41 pm
James Dunn,2010 La. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
The final edition will be out in the morning. [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:56 am
Dunn, 262 P.3d 1268 (Wyo. 2011) (attorney received public reprimand for failing to file timely governmental claims notice and complaint); In the Matter of Brown-Williams, 2012 WL 366587 (Ga. 2012) (attorney received public reprimand for missing statute of limitations in workers' compensation case). [read post]
29 May 2012, 5:56 am
Dunn, 262 P.3d 1268 (Wyo. 2011) (attorney received public reprimand for failing to file timely governmental claims notice and complaint); In the Matter of Brown-Williams, 2012 WL 366587 (Ga. 2012) (attorney received public reprimand for missing statute of limitations in workers' compensation case). [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am
The issue involves identifying and contrasting the type of risk assessment that a government agency follows for establishing public health guidelines versus an expert analysis of toxicity and causation in a toxic tort case.The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence explains that [p]roof of risk and proof of causation entail somewhat different questions because risk assessment frequently calls for a cost-benefit analysis. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 8:19 am
Galena, Illinois 61036-1828 Phone: 815/777-0037 Fax: 815/776-9146 Johnson Neal E. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
The second edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence contained a chapter by the late Professor Margaret Berger, who took pains to point out the difference between agency assessments and the adjudication of causal claims in court: [p]roof of risk and proof of causation entail somewhat different questions because risk assessment frequently calls for a cost-benefit analysis. [read post]
